Two households with the same heater, used the same way, can pay four times as much as each other. The heater is not the variable. Your state is.
A 6 kW heater used three times a week uses roughly 975 kilowatt-hours a year. At the US average residential rate that is about 179 dollars a year, or 15 a month. In Nevada it is 128. In Hawaii it is 514. The equipment is identical; only the rate moved.
A sauna heater draws its full rating while it is bringing the room up to temperature, then cycles on a thermostat once it gets there. So a session is two different loads back to back:
kWh per session = kW × (heat-up hours) + kW × (soak hours) × duty cycle
Worked on a 6 kW heater, 40 minutes to heat, 45 minutes of actual sauna, and a 50 % duty cycle while soaking:
6 × (40 ÷ 60) = 4.00 kWh heating up
6 × (45 ÷ 60) × 0.50 = 2.25 kWh soaking
6.25 kWh per session. Three sessions a week × 52 = 975 kWh a year.
That 50 % is an assumption, and you should know it is ours rather than anyone's published figure. We have not found a manufacturer that states what fraction of full draw a heater averages once the room is up to temperature. It depends on the insulation, the outdoor temperature, how often the door opens and where the thermostat sits. It is the single largest error term on this page, and it only affects the soak portion — the heat-up half is close to a known quantity. Halve the duty cycle and the annual figure drops to about 800 kWh; double the soak time and it climbs. Anyone quoting you a running cost without mentioning this has not thought about it.
975 kWh a year, priced at each state's published residential average. Cheapest first.
| # | State | cents/kWh | Per year (USD) | Per month (USD) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nevada | 13.11 | 128 | 10.65 |
| 2 | Nebraska | 13.25 | 129 | 10.77 |
| 3 | Utah | 13.37 | 130 | 10.86 |
| 4 | Louisiana | 13.49 | 132 | 10.96 |
| 5 | Tennessee | 14.07 | 137 | 11.43 |
| 6 | Arkansas | 14.12 | 138 | 11.47 |
| 7 | North Dakota | 14.12 | 138 | 11.47 |
| 8 | Kentucky | 14.26 | 139 | 11.59 |
| 9 | Oklahoma | 14.33 | 140 | 11.64 |
| 10 | Idaho | 14.37 | 140 | 11.68 |
| 11 | North Carolina | 14.74 | 144 | 11.98 |
| 12 | Mississippi | 14.88 | 145 | 12.09 |
| 13 | Washington | 14.91 | 145 | 12.11 |
| 14 | New Mexico | 15.06 | 147 | 12.24 |
| 15 | Florida | 15.10 | 147 | 12.27 |
| 16 | Montana | 15.14 | 148 | 12.30 |
| 17 | Arizona | 15.18 | 148 | 12.33 |
| 18 | Wyoming | 15.24 | 149 | 12.38 |
| 19 | South Dakota | 15.36 | 150 | 12.48 |
| 20 | West Virginia | 15.45 | 151 | 12.55 |
| 21 | South Carolina | 15.55 | 152 | 12.63 |
| 22 | Kansas | 15.71 | 153 | 12.76 |
| 23 | Iowa | 15.93 | 155 | 12.94 |
| 24 | Texas | 15.94 | 155 | 12.95 |
| 25 | Missouri | 16.22 | 158 | 13.18 |
| 26 | Oregon | 16.32 | 159 | 13.26 |
| 27 | Georgia | 16.36 | 160 | 13.29 |
| 28 | Alabama | 16.40 | 160 | 13.32 |
| 29 | Colorado | 17.13 | 167 | 13.92 |
| 30 | Virginia | 17.22 | 168 | 13.99 |
| 31 | Indiana | 17.51 | 171 | 14.23 |
| 32 | Minnesota | 17.52 | 171 | 14.23 |
| 33 | Ohio | 19.19 | 187 | 15.59 |
| 34 | Delaware | 19.29 | 188 | 15.67 |
| 35 | Wisconsin | 19.56 | 191 | 15.89 |
| 36 | Illinois | 19.89 | 194 | 16.16 |
| 37 | Pennsylvania | 21.73 | 212 | 17.66 |
| 38 | Maryland | 21.84 | 213 | 17.75 |
| 39 | Michigan | 22.99 | 224 | 18.68 |
| 40 | Connecticut | 24.32 | 237 | 19.76 |
| 41 | District of Columbia | 24.39 | 238 | 19.82 |
| 42 | Vermont | 24.44 | 238 | 19.86 |
| 43 | New Jersey | 24.95 | 243 | 20.27 |
| 44 | New Hampshire | 27.01 | 263 | 21.95 |
| 45 | Alaska | 28.21 | 275 | 22.92 |
| 46 | Rhode Island | 29.23 | 285 | 23.75 |
| 47 | New York | 29.49 | 288 | 23.96 |
| 48 | Maine | 29.59 | 289 | 24.04 |
| 49 | Massachusetts | 29.61 | 289 | 24.06 |
| 50 | California | 34.74 | 339 | 28.23 |
| 51 | Hawaii | 52.72 | 514 | 42.84 |
Rates: EIA Electric Power Monthly, residential, June 2026. US average 18.34 cents per kilowatthour, which puts the same sauna at about 179 dollars a year.
Same 6 kW heater, same three sessions a week, same 975 kWh a year. Annual cost in dollars at each state’s published residential rate.
Cheapest to most expensive is a factor of four for identical equipment used identically. Nevada at 13.11 cents against Hawaii at 52.72. This is the part of an appliance decision that no product review can tell you, because it is not a property of the product — and it is routinely larger than the difference between the models people spend weeks comparing.
The rate in that table is an average, not a tariff, and the difference matters when you are adding a new load. EIA's own glossary says the figure "is calculated by dividing the total monthly revenue by the corresponding total monthly sales for each sector and geographic area". It is money collected divided by energy sold, so every fixed monthly customer charge, minimum bill and rider is inside it — spread across kilowatt-hours that those charges do not actually scale with.
When you switch a sauna on, what you incur is your marginal energy rate, and the average can be wrong in either direction. On a flat tariff with a large fixed charge, the average sits above your marginal rate and the table overestimates your sauna. On a tiered tariff, a new load can push you into a higher block and the marginal rate is above the average, so the table underestimates. On a time-of-use tariff, when you run it decides the answer outright — and a sauna is a discretionary evening load, which is exactly the window that is usually priced highest.
The fix takes a minute. Find the energy charge on your own bill, the per-kWh line rather than the total divided by your usage, and use that instead. The calculator below has a box for it.
The same arithmetic with your own heater, your own session length and your own rate — and it does the air purifier and the water softener at the same time, which is usually the more honest question.
Open the calculatorIn rough order of how much leverage each one has:
Notice that two of the top five are decided when the room is built. If you are still at the design stage, insulation and glass area are the running-cost decisions, not the heater model.
The comparison people ask for is infrared against traditional, and on running cost it is not close, because the installed power is not close. A one- to two-person far-infrared cabin such as the Dynamic Barcelona lists its supply as 120V/15 A, which is at most about 1.4 kW of continuous draw. The smallest traditional heater Harvia sells in the KIP range is 3.0 kW at 240V, and 6 kW is a common size for a real room.
So a traditional sauna is roughly four times the installed power of a small infrared cabin, and it also needs a longer heat-up. Expect the running cost to differ by something in that neighbourhood.
We are not going to give you a precise infrared figure, and here is why. The duty cycle problem above applies to infrared cabins too, and if anything it applies harder: a radiant panel cabin reaches its operating point quickly and then cycles, and no manufacturer publishes that fraction either. Multiplying one unpublished assumption by another and printing the result to the nearest dollar would look authoritative and mean nothing. What we can say with a source behind it is the installed power, and that is the number that sets the ceiling.
The installation, which for a traditional sauna is usually the largest single number in the project and is driven almost entirely by the distance from your electrical panel and how hard that path is to reach. Any demand charge, minimum bill or seasonal rate structure on your tariff. The heat a sauna dumps into a conditioned house, which your air conditioning then pays to remove in summer. Water, if you use a shower either side of a session, which most people do. And the replacement cost of the equipment over a decade, which usually dwarfs the electricity.
The rate table is EIA's published figure. The usage assumptions are stated as assumptions wherever they appear, because one of them is not published by anybody and pretending otherwise would be the easiest lie on this page.